In today’s world, societal and political changes are happening right before our eyes that will profoundly influence the lives of future generations: the shift from industrial society to information society, the realignment of the global world order, increasing supranational coordination, as observed already during the pandemic or in the context of the climate narrative.
Amidst these changes, globally interconnected technocrats inclined towards the ideology of Social Darwinism have built an increasingly powerful, government-like position for themselves. In their worldview, socially, financially, or politically influential individuals (elites) are considered genetically superior, while the rest of society is viewed as “unfit.” Eugenics becomes the tool for implementation.
With the book “Inquiries into Human Fertilities and its Development,” Francis Galton, the cousin of Charles Darwin, laid the foundation for eugenics. Eugenics comes from the Greek words “eu” – good and “genos” – race, family. In meaning, it is often translated as “good genes.” Eugenics sees physical and mental health, intelligence, social competence, and attractiveness as genetically determined and therefore heritable. Based on this premise, eugenics measures aim at both increasing the reproduction of individuals and races deemed to have positive hereditary traits, as well as preventing the reproduction of individuals and races deemed to have negative and undesirable traits.
Eugenics became fashionable in the early 19th century, leading to the emergence of eugenics organizations in many places, such as the “Archiv für Rassen- und Gesellschaftsbiologie”2 , “Eugenic Education Society”3, “American Breeders Association”4, or the “American Birth Control League”5.
After the end of World War I, eugenics gained increasing interest and was globally regarded as a science supported by many governments. Among the most prominent financial supporters were the Rockefeller Foundation, Carnegie Foundation, Macy Foundation, and McGovern Foundation. These are all foundations whose founders were protagonists of eugenics and adherents of Social Darwinism.
In the 1920s, various states in the USA passed laws leading to forced sterilizations of approximately 100,000 people deemed unfit for reproduction. This laid the groundwork for the inhumane evolution of eugenics towards racial purity enforced by the Nazis in Germany. Nevertheless, the most important German eugenics organizations, especially the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity, and Eugenics (later Max Planck Institute for Medical Research), where Josef Mengele worked, were consistently financially supported by the Rockefeller Foundation until 1947.
After the horror of World War II and the revelation of crimes related to eugenics, most eugenicists hastened to distance themselves – at least from the depravity of the Nazis’ experiments.
The majority of former eugenicists then joined the Neo-Malthusianism movement, which was not tainted by the atrocities of the Nazis. Neo-Malthusianism describes the ideology that the resource needs of the exponentially growing world population will eventually surpass the Earth’s only linearly increasing resource availability at some point, leading to global famines and societal collapses. According to this ideology, active population policies are necessary based on the principles of Social Darwinism. The name has changed, but the ideology remains the same.
After World War II, Julian Huxley, who had previously served as secretary alongside John Maynard Keynes (!) and later president of the British Eugenics Society, played a central role. In addition to his passion for eugenics, he co-founded the “International Union for Conservation of Nature” in 1948, which later gave rise to the “World Wildlife Fund” (WWF) in 19616. Julian Huxley also coined the term “transhumanism” and founded UNESCO in 1946 as a subsidiary of the UN7, which he directed as Director-General from 1946 to 1948. He wrote in 1946:
“It is to be expected that the indirect effect of present-day civilization is more dysgenic than eugenic and it is very likely that the dead weight of genetic stupidity, physical weakness, mental instability, and disease proneness, which already exist in the human species, will prove too great a burden for real progress to be achieved.”
Huxley collaborated with the London Tavistock Clinic8, which was funded by the Rockefeller and Macy Foundations from the 1930s to the 1950s. Basic research was conducted there on soldiers traumatized in World War I, which later evolved into the infamous American program MK Ultra9.
A colleague at the Tavistock Clinic and friend of Huxley’s was psychiatrist Brock Chrisholm, who also founded an organization affiliated with the UN: the World Health Organization (WHO). For the noble goal of promoting global mental and physical health, there could hardly have been a less suitable person10. Chrisholm advocated for erasing the “concept of right and wrong” and the “belief in the wisdom of the elderly” from people’s consciousness and said, even eight years after the WHO’s founding:
“To achieve world government, it is necessary to erase individualism, loyalty to family tradition, national patriotism, and religious dogmas from the minds of men.”
These insane thoughts of Chrisholm seem to be increasingly prevalent in society today. However, the WHO is just one of many organizations pursuing these goals. Implementing such transformative social and societal changes over decades requires an ideological, intergenerational doctrine shared, driven, and controlled by various interconnected centers of power.
As the foundation with the highest investment and funding volume worldwide, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation can be considered such a power center. The foundation conducted research and experiments with injectable contraceptives in many developing countries, not without various scandals11. Supporters of these vaccination campaigns included the WHO, the UN Population Fund, the UN Development Programme, the World Bank, and the Rockefeller Foundation.
Bill Gates Sr. was also a confessed eugenicist and Neo-Malthusianist12. He chaired Planned Parenthood and served as chairman of the board of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation until his death in 2018. Therefore, it should come as no surprise that the foundation continues to support Planned Parenthood with millions of dollars to this day. Planned Parenthood operates 650 abortion clinics in the USA and has been embroiled in a major scandal involving the delivery of body parts from aborted embryos on demand13. Planned Parenthood is considered the largest lobbying organization for abortion worldwide and is particularly strong on the EU level.
Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum (WEF) is considered a platform for exchange and planning of the cabal for the technocrats. The WEF’s websites contain numerous documents openly describing the goals and means of reducing the world population. Neo-Malthusians cite a population cap of approximately 1 billion people. According to their ideology, a reduction requires a radically different world order, the “New World Order.”
Although Neo-Malthusians have been spreading alarmism about population growth for decades, none of their apocalyptic predictions have come true in the last 70 years. Since World War II, the world population has grown from 3 billion people to approximately 8 billion today. Nevertheless, resource availability covers resource needs at least as well as it did 80 years ago.
From the Neo-Malthusian perspective, new approaches, arguments, and measures were necessary. Conveniently, the UN created the IPCC14 to establish and spread the narrative of anthropogenic climate change caused by CO2.
The greatest dogmatic proponents of anthropogenic climate change are the technocratic global elites. Because many measures aimed at reducing CO2 serve all too obviously as a pretext to artificially reduce resource availability. This is also reflected in the UN’s Agenda 2030, with which the WEF cooperates extensively. In this way, the Malthusian imbalance between resource demand and availability is to be created, in order to argue for a social Darwinist population policy as the only alternative.
Now, birth control has long been the only tool of the neo-Malthusians. As recently as 2014, at the annual WEF meeting in Davos, Al Gore and Bill Gates proposed that global depopulation was a necessary means to stop climate change, with contraception being the key. The kinship with eugenics is unmistakable. As is the contemptuous attitude of Gore and Gates. However, these two “philanthropists” probably knew back then that contraception alone could not achieve the desired depopulation.
It is all the more disturbing when these very individuals produce an inadequately tested, genetically altering vaccine and experiment with it on millions of people. It is also striking that it is especially the politicians indoctrinated by the WEF’s Young Global Leaders program, such as Macron, Baerbock, von der Leyen, and others, who attempt to shift the boundaries of normality as opinion leaders. Their views, such as rejecting diplomacy to end wars or advocating for the deliberate escalation of conflicts, are supposed to be seen as legitimate and socially acceptable positions.
By 2015 at the latest, the appearance of the technocrats became increasingly manipulative. This may be related to scientific progress in genetics research. Neo-Malthusians saw many new opportunities in this. Through the decoding of the human genome and the initial successes of CRISPR15 technology, which allows targeted changes to individual DNA molecules, “climate-friendly eugenics” gained momentum.
For example, Professor Matthew Liao of New York University proposed in Davos in 2016 to use genetic manipulation for climate protection, such as making people smaller so they consume less food. In addition, night vision capabilities should be improved so people consume less energy, or other discussed methods to create a population intolerant to meat, thereby reducing greenhouse gas emissions from livestock farming.
It is also worth listening to Klaus Schwab’s chief strategist, Prof. Yuval Harari, who likes to express his social Darwinist attitude by referring to the majority of people as “animals” or “useless eaters” in his vision of the future.
However, social Darwinism not only justifies the elimination of sick, disabled, or socially incompatible individuals, but also targets those who disagree with the prevailing political views. This is exactly what the methods of the “Great Reset” envisage, should they prevail.
The goal has been the same for 100 years: the creation of a perfect human race – and ultimately the immortality of the elite. For this, the “unfit” will have to go. Through psyops and propaganda, the masses are to be convinced that eugenics, euthanasia, and mass murder are mandatory for the mental and physical health of people or for mitigating global warming.
Will humanity intervene and prevent the extinction of its own species, or will it allow it? Time will tell.
1 Social scientific theory stating that the principles of biological evolution proposed by Darwin can be applied to the social sphere.
2 One of the central starting points for racial eugenics under the NSDAP.
3 Until 2021 actually still called the Galton Institute, now Adelphi Genetic Forum – dedicated to ethical questions about human heredity and reproductive medicine.
4 By Charles Davenport, arguably the best-known advocate of race-based eugenics and politically responsible for various forced sterilizations in the USA.
5 By the now considered racist Margaret Sanger, now Planned Parenthood.
6 By this means he became a pioneer for the symbiosis of nature, environmental protection and population control, thus bringing together resource conservation of the earth vs. resource consumption of overpopulation in the neo-Malthusian sense.
7 The establishment of the UN was largely promoted by the Rockefeller Foundation and based to a large extent on organizational blueprints of the foundation.
8 In recent years, the Tavistock Clinic has stood out worldwide for gender reassignment and is at the center of the scandal surrounding the promotion and lax handling of puberty-delaying hormone blockers for adolescents, which were banned in the UK in February 2024.
9 MK Ultra was a secret research program led by the CIA on methods of mind control. The scientific investigations of torture methods used by the Nazis were further developed.
10 The current WHO president and veterinarian Adhanom Ghebreyesus, a protege of Bill Gates who significantly finances the WHO, is accused of multiple human rights abuses and genocide in his previous position as a government official in Ethiopia. So it hasn’t gotten any better.
11 Especially memorable is the distribution of tetanus vaccine by the foundation to millions of people in developing countries, which turned out to contain hCG (human chorionic gonadotropin), a substance used to induce infertility in women.
12 Same is true for his son, Bill Gates Jr., who is an avowed eugenicist and neo-Malthusian, too.
13 Including the use of corresponding abortion techniques, where the ordered organs are removed from the still living embryos in the uterus so they are not destroyed.
14 IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), another center of power, was established by the UN in 1988 as a sub-organization, with the statutory goal of “proving anthropogenic climate change”.
15 A molecular biological procedure to cut a DNA strand at a predetermined location and to specifically modify it there. At the cutting site, individual DNA building blocks can be inserted, removed, or modified.